留学生论文代写

美国论文代写服务机构,提供高质量的Assignment代写、美国essay代写留学生论文代写留学生essay代写、Paper代写、Report代写服务,留学生Essay作业及论文代写代做,美国、英国、澳洲、加拿大Essay代写...

 


 

the respective colonial (or semi-colonial) experiences of the two nations during the 19th century. However our analysis differs from the “colonialism-institutions hypothesis” in several ways. Colonialism in Brazil and India lead to two divergent processes: On the one hand, regressive political and economic institutions (slavery, regressive land tenure systems, lopsided distribution of political power etc.) emerged. On the other hand, colonial exploitation led to another set of consequences: disenfranchisement amongst the masses and sections of the elite (especially the industrial elite) who sought to break from the international division of labour that had restricted their economies into exporters of primary commodities. One therefore finds that after independence, though a number of colonial institutions remained, a number of others were dismantled.

 

The emergence of a proactive state and the initiation of import substituting industrialization were the biggest institutional changes that were introduced in the 20th century. However, the specific differences in historical experiences led these countries to adopt different sets of policies even within a state lead ISI framework. In Brazil, the state and domestic class interests aligned themselves in such a way so as to provide space for FDI in the industrialization process. In contrast, in India the post-colonial society established institutions that restricted FDI in the economy until the neo-liberal era. The basic scheme of our argument can thus be explained as follows:

 

19th century historical factors → Institutional persistence and institutional rupture → role of FDI in the economy → Industrial growth

 

In the first two sections of this article we shall briefly review the function of foreign investments both prior to and during the process of import substituting industrialization (ISI) in each country. The following section we analyze the changing role of FDI in the neo-liberal era, when ISI was abandoned. Following this, we then analyze the contemporary role of FDI in the respective economies, and then examine the advantages and disadvantages the different policies towards foreign capital have had on the development process of each country.

 

FDI IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

 

Brazil

 

In the early years after independence (from 1822 to the 1850s) foreign investments (mostly of British origin) were mainly concentrated in finance and trade. The production of export products (coffee and sugar) was dominated by local residents, while the shipping and the financing of trade was in the hands of foreigners. In the second half of the 19th century the Brazilian government encouraged foreign capital to build the country’s infrastructure – railroads, ports, and urban public utilities. Much of these investments were designed to better integrate Brazil into the world’s trading network as a supplier of primary goods. In 1880 the total stock of foreign investments were estimated at US$ 190 million; this expanded to US$ 1.9 billion by 1914 and to US$ 2.6 billion by 1930. Prior to 1930 Britain was the dominant foreign investor; it still accounted for 50% of foreign investment in that year, though the United States share was rapidly increasing, already accounting for 25% of total foreign investments.

 

Although foreign investments contributed resources and technology to Brazil in the years prio


你们是如何为我选择Essay代写人员的呢?

 

我们首先将您所提供的大学专业信息以及Essay代写等级资料输入我们的数据系统,我们的系统会很快的在我们已经聘用和注册的Essay代写人员中筛选出最适合的代写论文专家。然后,我们会对论文写手之前的代写经验再次进行确认。之后,我们就会联系适合的代写论文专业人员把您的具体要求发出,我们的Essay代写写手在收到论文资料后会与我们进行确认。在保证质量和能够按时交付论文的情况下即可与我们确认。这样做的目的,就是为了保证您的Essay代写任务找到最可以胜任的论文专家。

本篇文章转载至优质官网:http://www.essayquality.com

登录注册后才能评论。